- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010446572026 NC: 2026:KHC:37643 WP No. 20373 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 20373 OF 2026 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: 1. KULLAPPA @ BYRAPPA S/O. LATE. CHANNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/AT HOSURU GOLLAHALLI VILLAGE. HOSURU POST, BIDADI HOBLI, RAMANAGARA TALUK, BENGALURU SOUTH DISTRICT - 562109. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. PURUSHOTHAMA H.E., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, M.S.BUILDING, BENGALURU - 560001. REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE TAHSILDAR RAMANAGARA TALUK, RAMANAGARA, BENGALURU SOUTH DISTRICT …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT B.P.RADHA, AGA) Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010446572026 NC: 2026:KHC:37643 WP No. 20373 of 2026 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS, DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATIONS DTD 2.9.2025 AND 3.9.2025 VIDE ANNEXURE- LAND M BY ISSUING THE SAGUVALI CHIT IN RESPECT OF LAND IN SY. NO.72, MEASURING 2.00 ACRES OF HOSUR VILLAGE, BIDADI HOBLI, RAMANAGARA TALUK IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER.II) PASS SUCH OTHER RELIEF/S AS THIS HON'BLE COURT DEEMED FIT UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE.ALLOW THE WRIT PETITION IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS WRIT PETITION IS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER The grievance of the petitioner in this petition is to consider the representations dated 02.09.2025 and 03.09.2025 (Annexures - L and M) respectively. 2. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and on careful consideration of the representations at Annexure L and M, it is indicated that the petitioner is seeking, - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010446572026 NC: 2026:KHC:37643 WP No. 20373 of 2026 issuance of the saguvali chit based on the grant order made by the respondent-State. 3. In that view of the matter, respondent No.2 is directed to consider the representations at Annexures-L and M, after verifying the original records in their office and take decision in the matter in accordance with law, if the said representations have not been considered. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE AG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 27