1 CGHC010303952026 2026:CGHC:34683 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4093 of 2026 Ghanshyam, S/o Shri Indrapal, Aged About 47 Years R/o Vill - Chainpur, Tehsil Manendragarh, Dist -Manendragarh -Chrimiri -Bharatpur (C.G.) Present R/o Vill - Kelhari, Tehsil Manendragarh, Dist - Manendragarh - Chrimiri -Bharatpur (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Revenue And Disaster Management Department, Indrawati Bhawan, Nava Raipur, Dist - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Collector Manendragarh -Chrimiri -Bharatpur, Dist -Manendragarh- Chrimiri -Bharatpur (C.G.) 3 - Tahsildar, Manendragarh, Dist -Manendragarh-Chrimiri -Bharatpur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Akash Agrawal, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sabyasachi Choubey, G.A. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 07.08.2026 1. The petitioner has filed the instant petition seeking following reliefs:- Digitally signed by AMIT PATEL Digitally signed by AMIT PATEL 2 “10.1 That this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to call the entire record of the Courts below. 10.2 That this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ of MANDAMUS directing the respondent No. 03 to take action upon the application for division made by the petitioner in accordance with law and to decide the same within stipulated time frame as directed by this Hon'ble Court. 10.3 That this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent No. 02 to take action against respondent No. 03 as per provision of Chhattisgarh Lok Sewa Guarantee Act, 2011. 10.4 That this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to issue any writ or direction or order as deem fit in the interest of justice. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the application is not being decided by the concerned Tahsildar in respect of partition. 3. Learned counsel for the State has made an objection that the application itself is not filed in the appropriate format and that the petitioner has to file an appropriate application before the concerned Tahsildar in respect of partition, while properly making 3 the required parties, who are required to be noticed, which has not been done in this case. 4. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and to file an appropriate application before the concerned Tahsildar in the proper format in respect of partition, as prayed by him. 5. With this observation and direction, the petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge AMIT PATEL