Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 31439 (KAR)

M/S MONE HOSPITALITY INTERNATIONAL PVT LTD v. M A WASAI TRUST

WP/1909/2022 · 2026-07-28

Vijaykumar A Patil

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010036512022 NC: 2026:KHC:39089 W.P. No.1909/2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL WRIT PETITION NO.1909/2022 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. M/S. MONE HOSPITALITY INTERNATIONAL PVT LTD A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER COMPANIES ACT, 1956, HAVING OFFICE AT NO.27 HAJEE SIR ISMAIL MOSQUE ROAD FRAZER TOWN, BENGALURU-560005 REP. BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY. 2. MR. KUNHI MOOSA S/O LATE KUNHI AHMED AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS OFFICE AT NO.27 HAJEE SIR ISMAIL MOSQUE ROAD FRAZER TOWN, BENGALURU-560005. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. HASAN M, ADV., FOR SRI. NAVEED AHMED, ADV., FOR P1) AND: M.A. WASAI TRUST A REGISTERED TRUST HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.221 NARAYAN PILLAI STREET SHIVAJINAGAR BENGALURU-560001 REP. BY ITS TRUSTEE. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. RAGHAVENDRA PRASAD M.S. ADV.,) Digitally signed by RUPA V Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010036512022 NC: 2026:KHC:39089 W.P. No.1909/2022 THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ALLOW THE WRIT PETITION ON COSTS. QUASH THE ORDER AT ANNEXURE-E DATED 07.01.2022 ISSUED BY THE LXXXVII ADDL. CITY CIVIL & SESSIONS JUDGE AT BENGALURU (CCH-88) IN COMM O.S.385/2020 AND REJECT THE PLAINT AS CONTEMPLATED UNDER LAW & ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL ORAL ORDER On 10.07.2020 there was no representation for the petitioners. Today, Sri.Hasan M., learned counsel appearing on behalf of Sri.Naveed Ahmed, learned counsel for petitioner No.1 submits that he has given no objection to the petitioner. 2. In view of the said submission, it appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the matter. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE ABK, List No.: 1 Sl No.: 26