IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT (116) RANJIT SINGH STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS CORAM: Present: ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral) 1. the Constitution of India seeking issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus consider and decide the representation/complaint dated 03.06.2026 (Annexure P 2. respondents No. 5 and 6 and has filed his record. 3. present petition on the ground that it contains certain typographical errors. 4. withdrawn, the case. July 20, 2026 manju Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether Reportable: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RANJIT SINGH Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN **** Mr. Gurjant Singh Bhullar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amandeep Singh Samra, AAG, Punjab. **** ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing respondents No. 3 and 4 to consider and decide the representation/complaint dated 03.06.2026 (Annexure P-1) in a time-bound manner. Mr. Narinder Singh Dadawal, Advocate, appears on behalf of respondents No. 5 and 6 and has filed his vakalatna Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present petition on the ground that it contains certain typographical errors. In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as at this stage, without expressing any July 20, 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether Reportable:- Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-8113-2026 Date of Decision:- 20.07.2026 ……Petitioner ……Respondents ALOK JAIN Mr. Gurjant Singh Bhullar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amandeep Singh Samra, AAG, Punjab. The present petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of an appropriate writ, order or directing respondents No. 3 and 4 to consider and decide the representation/complaint dated 03.06.2026 Mr. Narinder Singh Dadawal, Advocate, appears on behalf of vakalatnama, which is taken on Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present petition on the ground that it contains certain typographical errors. In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as without expressing any opinion on the merits of (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE 20.07.2026 ……Petitioner ……Respondents The present petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of an appropriate writ, order or directing respondents No. 3 and 4 to consider and decide the representation/complaint dated 03.06.2026 Mr. Narinder Singh Dadawal, Advocate, appears on behalf of , which is taken on Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as opinion on the merits of MANJU 2026.07.20 18:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document