APHC010291882026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3562] THURSDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA WRIT PETITION NO: 15406/2026 Between: 1. BANDARU FARIDA SUBHAN, W/O BANDARU RAMA MOHANA RAO, AGED 54 YEARS, FEMALE, D.NO.11-218/1 ,AMBATI NAGAR, YERRABALEM VILLAGE-522503, MANGALAGIRI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT RESIDENT OF MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522237. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE DGP, A.P.POLICE HEADQUARTERS, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522503. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICEURBAN, DISTRICT POLICE OFFICE, MAIN ROAD, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522002. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KOTHAPETA POLICE STATION, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 52200 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Habeas Corpus by directing the Respondents forthwith to produce my husband i.e., Bandaru Rama Mohana Rao, S/o. Venkateswararao, Aged 68 years, D.No.11-218/1, Ambati Nagar, Yerrabalem village, Mangalagiri Mandal, Guntur District before this Honble Court, consequently handover Bandaru Rama Mohana Rao, S/o Venkateswararao to me, further take action against Respondent Nos.1 to 4 for their in-action to my representations dated 08.06.2026, 08.06.2026, 13.05.2026, 23.04.2026, 14.08.2025 11.12.2024 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MULLAPUDI SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. THE ADVOCATE GENERAL The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA WRIT PETITION NO: 15406/2026 ORDER: (per Ravi Nath Tilhari, J) On 16.06.2026, a Co-ordinate Bench passed the following order: “There is no appearance for the petitioner. The detenu has been produced before us today. Upon being questioned, the detenu has stated that he has separated from the petitioner on account of various differences between them and he is not under the confinement or illegal detention of any person. As neither the petitioner nor the learned counsel for the petitioner is present, the matter is adjourned. As the statement of the alleged detenu has been recorded, there shall be no further need for appearance of the detenu, and his presence is dispensed with. Post on 18.06.2026.” 3. On that date neither the petitioner nor learned counsel for the petitioner was present. 4. Today, Sri M. Satyanarayana, learned counsel appointed by Andhra Pradesh Legal Services Authority appears for the petitioner. 5. After going through the order dated 16.06.2026, we are satisfied that in view of the statement made by the detenue on 16.06.2026, the writ petition for for Habeas Corpus does not survive any more. 5. The writ petition is dismissed. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed. ___________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI,J ______________________ SUBHENDU SAMANTA,J Dated:18.06.2026 AG 88 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA WRIT PETITION NO: 15406/2026 Dated:18.06.2026 AG