Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3141 (ALL)

DR VAISHNO DUTT v. STATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

WRIC/17375/2026 · 2026-05-04

Siddharth Nandan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 17375 of 2026 Court No. - 38 HON'BLE SIDDHARTH NANDAN, J. 1. Shri Vinod Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition be dismissed as infructuous as the prayer made in the writ petition, has become infructuous. 2. The writ petition is, accordingly, consigned to record. 3. Order has been passed in the presence of Shri Alok Tiwari, learned counsel appearing for respondent no.6 and Ms. Gulka Tandon Advocate holding brief of Shri Shivendra Kumar Singh, learned counsel appearing for respondent no.3. May 5, 2026 S.Prakash Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anand Kumar, Vinod Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : Alok Tiwari, C.S.C., Shivendra Kumar Singh (Siddharth Nandan,J.) Dr Vaishno Dutt .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 7 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHASHI PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad