Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 31408 (PNJ)

RAVINDERPAL SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

CWP/21821/2026 · 2026-07-20

Namit Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

PHHC011170032026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 125 CWP-21821-2026 Date of decision : 20.07.2026 Ravinderpal Singh ....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Present: Mr. Raywant Kaushish, Advocate with Mr. P.K. Panchal, Advocate for the petitioner. NAMIT KUMAR J. (Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, seeking issuance of a writ of certiorari for quashing the orders of promotion dated 15.12.2023, 29.03.2023, 13.02.2024 and 15.10.2024 (Annexures P-8 to P-11) to the extent that they denies the promotion to the petitioner to the post of Deputy Superintendent of Police w.e.f. 08.08.2013 (Annexure P-1) and thereafter, from the date his juniors were promoted. Further, seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to promote the petitioner on the basis of his seniority-cum-merit w.e.f. the date his juniors have been promoted, with all consequential benefits. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for redressal of his grievances, the petitioner has also served legal notice dated 05.02.2026 (Annexure P-14) to the respondents which is still pending consideration. He further submits that at this stage, the petitioner would be satisfied, if appropriate directions are issued to the respondents to VINOD KOTHIYAL 2026.07.20 17:06 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document PHHC011170032026 CWP-21821-2026 -2- consider and decide the said legal notice, by passing a speaking order, in a time bound manner. 3. Notice of motion. 4. Mr. Rohit Ahuja, D.A.G., Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the respondents-State. He has no objection to the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the record of the case. 6. Without going into the merits of the case at this stage, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.1 to consider and decide legal notice dated 05.02.2026 (Annexure P-14) submitted by the petitioner expeditiously, by passing a speaking order after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, preferably within a period of 04 months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Further, the decision taken thereon shall be conveyed to the petitioner. (NAMIT KUMAR) 20.07.2026 JUDGE kothiyal Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No VINOD KOTHIYAL 2026.07.20 17:06 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document