- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010053872024 NC: 2026:KHC:38665 WP No. 3782 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 3782 OF 2024 (L-RES) BETWEEN: EXCEL METAL ENGINEERING PVT. LTD., PLOT NO.340, 9TH CROSS, 4TH PHASE, PEENYA INDUSTRIAL AREA, BENGALURU-560 058. REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, REGISTERED UNDER COMAPNIES ACT, 1956. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRASHANTH B.R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE ASSISTANT LABOUR COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU DIVISION-1, KARMIKA LABOUR INSTITUTE, MANJUNATH NAGAR, BAGALAKUNTE, BENGALURU-560 073. 2. EXCEL METAL ENGINEERING EMPLOYEES UNION TRADE, UNION OFFICE, V.G. GOPAL BUILDING, 3RD FLOOR, NO.20/1 LALBATH FORT ROAD, BENGALURU-560 004. REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY, Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010053872024 NC: 2026:KHC:38665 WP No. 3782 of 2024 REGISTERED UNDER TRADE UNION ACT, 1929. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. RAJA KUMAR, AGA FOR R1; R2 SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Prashanth B.R., counsel for the petitioner and Sri.Rajakumar M., Additional Government Advocate for respondent No.1 appeared in person. Counsel for the petitioner submits that a memo has been filed stating that the petition may be dismissed as infructuous. When queried, counsel for the petitioner submits that a conscious decision is taken about the withdrawal of the petition as having become infructuous and if an order is passed the petitioner shall not seek review of the order or modification of the order. Counsel, therefore, submits that the memo may be - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010053872024 NC: 2026:KHC:38665 WP No. 3782 of 2024 placed on record and the writ petition may be dismissed as having become infructuous. The oral submission and the memo is placed on record. As the counsel on record has taken a conscious decision about the withdrawal of the petition, the Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Because of dismissal of the Writ Petition, all pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of. Sd/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 46