Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 31386 (CHH)

JAGDISH EKKA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH AND OTHERS

ACQA/10/2019 · 2026-08-11

Shri Sanjay Agrawal, Shri Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010014592019 2026:CGHC:35557-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ACQA No. 10 of 2019 1 - Jagdish Ekka S/o Late Sukha Uraon, Aged About 52 Years, R/o Village Lalmati, Police Station Ambikapur, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh., District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh. ... Appellant versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh And Others , District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh. 2 - Rustam S/o Amiruddin Ansari, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Village Batwahi, Police Station Lundra, District Surguja Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh. 3 - Mohd. Hamid Raja Ansari S/o Gulam Ansari, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Village Batwahi, Police Station Lundra, District Surguja Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Appellant : None. For Respondent No. 1 : Mr. Sacchidanand Yadav, P.L. For other Respondents : None. DB: Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay S. Agrawal and Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal Order on Board (12.08.2026) 1. No one appeared nor any representation was made on behalf of the Appellant, even when the matter is called in the second round. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the present case. 2 2. In the above circumstances, in absence of any representation on behalf of the appellant, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. 3. Accordingly, the instant appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- Sd/- Sd/- Sd/- (Sanjay S. Agrawal) (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Judge Judge $ourabh