Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2026 DAILYLAW 31372 (ORI)

AMULYA KUMAR PARIDA v. STATE OF ODISHA

WP(C)/25750/2026 · 2026-08-21

Chittaranjan Dash

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.25750 of 2026 CNR No.ODHC010595822026 Amulya Kumar Parida & Others …. Petitioners Mr. S. Mishra, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha and Others …. Opp. Parties Mr. S. Das, AGA CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE CHITTARANJAN DASH Order No. ORDER 21.08.2026 01. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Parties. 2. Referring to the direction passed by the Coordinate Bench of this Court in W.P.(C) No.31679 of 2011, reported in 2020 (II) ILR- CUT-84, the Petitioner had earlier approached this Court in W.P.(C) No.23700 of 2020 seeking a direction to the Opposite Parties therein to extend to him the benefit of the judgment dated 05.03.2020 passed in W.P.(C) No.31679 of 2011 and to grant him all consequential benefits, including regularisation of service, in terms of the said judgment. 3. It is submitted that the aforesaid judgment of the learned Single Judge was carried in Writ Appeal No.10 of 2021, which came to be dismissed, and the same was thereafter affirmed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.123627 of 2021. The grievance of the Petitioner is that, despite the issue having attained finality at the hands of the Hon’ble Supreme Court, the authorities have not extended the benefit of the said judgment to him. The Petitioner, therefore, prays for a direction to the authorities p. 2 to extend the benefit of the aforesaid judgment by releasing the arrear salary and all other consequential service benefits from the date of his entitlement in terms of the judgment dated 05.03.2020 passed in W.P.(C) No.31679 of 2011 (Dhananjay Charan Dey and Others v. State of Orissa and Others). 4. Learned counsel for the Petitioners fairly submits that, in the event the Petitioners file a fresh representation ventilating their grievance and the authority considers the same in accordance with law, it would suffice. 5. Having regard to the aforesaid submission and in the absence of any serious objection from the learned Additional Standing Counsel, this Writ Petition is disposed of at the stage of admission with a direction that, in the event the Petitioners submit such representation within 15 (fifteen) days from the date of this order, Opposite Party No.1, the Commissioner-cum-Secretary to Government, School & Mass Education Department, Bhubaneswar, shall consider and dispose of the same in accordance with law and in the light of the judgments referred to hereinabove, within a period of 4 (four) weeks from the date of its receipt, and communicate the decision to the Petitioners within 2 (two) weeks thereafter. (Chittaranjan Dash) Judge Sarbani Designation: Junior Stenographer