SRI PRAJWAL S ALIAS PRAJWAL S GOWDA v. SMT SPARSHA Y S ALIAS KUSUMA
WP/31195/2024 · 2026-07-27
Chillakur Sumalatha
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 31357 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 31357 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010616102024 NC: 2026:KHC:38954 WP No. 31195 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA WRIT PETITION NO.31195 OF 2024 (GM-FC)
BETWEEN:
SRI PRAJWAL S. ALIAS PRAJWAL S. GOWDA S/O. SRI D. SURESH AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS R/AT BAGALGUNTE SIDEDAHALLI MAIN ROAD VISHWESHWARIAH LAYOUT BENGALURU-560 073 …PETITIONER (BY SRI PRAKASH M. PATIL, ADVOCATE, (ABSENT)) AND:
SMT. SPARSHA Y. S. ALIAS KUSUMA W/O. PRAJWAL S. GOWDA AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS OCC. ASSISTANT R/AT MANICHENAHALLI LAYOUT KASABA HOBLI, HASSAN TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT-573 201 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI HARSHITH B., ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 05.07.2024 PASSED ON IA NO.2 BY THE HON'BLE PRINCIPAL JUDGE, I ADDITIONAL FAMILY COURT AT HASSAN IN CRL.MISC.NO.86/2023 VIDE ANNEXURE-A.
Digitally signed by AASEEFA PARVEEN Location:
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010616102024 NC: 2026:KHC:38954 WP No. 31195 of 2024
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR REPORTING SETTLEMENT, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA
ORAL ORDER
No representation on petitioner's side on call. There was no representation even on 17.06.2026.
Sri.Harshith B., learned counsel for the respondent submits that the writ petition has become infructuous.
As there is no representation on petitioner's side and having considered the submission that is made by the learned counsel for the respondent, this Court is of the view that the petitioner is not evincing interest in the matter, as the same has become infructous as submitted by the learned counsel for the respondent.
Therefore, writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- (DR.CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE AP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 55