Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 31352 (CAL)

SWAPANESH DAS AND ANR v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS

WPA/873/2026 · 2026-07-29

Hiranmay Bhattacharyya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Court No. 10 (1629) 29.07.2026 (JPD 20) (S. Banerjee) Calcutta High Court In the Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri Appellate Side WPA 873 of 2026 Swapnesh Das & Anr. Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Bikramaditya Ghosh Mr. Vivek Saha Mr. Subhrajyoti Lahiri Mr. Binayak Bandopadhyay Mr. Hrisav Anirban Ghosh … for the petitioners Mr. Kunaljit Bhattacharjee, AGP Mr. Samar Rakshit … for the State Mr. Abhilash Mittal Ms. Hiqa Naz Pradhan … for the respondent nos. 5 and 6 The primary grievance of the petitioners is that the District Magistrate, Jalpaiguri, being the respondent no. 2, was not disposing of the representation of the petitioner dated March 12, 2026. Mr. Bhattacharjee, learned AGP, produces a copy of the order dated July 2, 2026 passed by the Additional District Magistrate (G) & Collector of Excise, Jalpaiguri rejecting the prayer of the 2 petitioner. By the said order liberty has also been granted to the petitioner to prefer an appeal before the Excise Commissioner, West Bengal in terms of the relevant notification. Since the representation has now been disposed of by an order dated July 2, 2026 and an appeal lies therefrom, nothing survives to be decided in this writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. Since the order dated July 2, 2026 is an appellable order, the petitioner is left free to work out his remedies in accordance with law. (Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, J.)