Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 31350 (CAL)

RAJIKUL ISLAM@RAJIKUL HOSSAIN@RAFIKUL ISLAM v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR

CRM(A)/564/2026 · 2026-07-30

Shampa Sarkar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

30.07.2026 SL No.12 Court No.11 (gc) CALCUTTA HIGH COURT IN THE CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI CRM (A) 564 of 2026 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Cooch Behar Sadar Women Police Station Case No.193 of 2024 dated 30.09.2024 under Sections 329(4)/70(1)/127(2)/351(3) of the BNS, 2023. And In the matter of : Rajikul Islam @ Rajikul Hossain @ Rafikul Islam - Petitioner. Ms. Kanak Mishra ….For the Petitioner. Mr. Avrojyoti Das, Ld. APP., Ms. Suman Sehanabis, Mr. Mayank Bhandari … For the State. 1. The petitioner prays for pre-arrest bail in connection with Cooch Behar Sadar Women Police Station Case No.193 of 2024 dated 30.09.2024 under Sections 329(4)/70(1)/127(2)/351(3) of the BNS, 2023. 2. This is the fifth application for anticipatory bail filed by the petitioner. This Court on July 20, 2026 permitted the petitioner to withdraw the application without any liberty to file afresh on the self-same cause of action. 3. The averment that the de facto complainant had decided to amicably settle the misunderstanding between the parties, is not supported by any documentary evidence, which could 2 persuade this Court to hold that there is any changed circumstances. 4. Accordingly, the prayer for pre-arrest bail is rejected. 5. The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, dismissed. 6. All parties shall act on the server copies of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Shampa Sarkar, J.)