- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32713 MFA No. 7411 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 7411 OF 2025 (CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SAIRAM VENGATRAMAN, S/O G. VENGATRAMAN, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS 2. SMT.S. JAYASHREE @ A. JAYASHREE, W/O SAIRAM VENGATRAMAN, AGED 44 YEARS BOTH ARE RESIDING AT NO.101, ETOILE BUILDING, BUR DUBAI, DUBAI, UAE, BOTH REP. BY THEIR GPA-HOLDER MR. P. SATISH, S/O B. S. PANDURANGA SETTY AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/ AT 1560, 5TH CROSS, BANASHANKARI-1ST STAGE, 2ND BLOCK BENGALURU-560 070, …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. SUKANYA BALIGA B.,ADVOCATE (ABSENT) AND: 1. RAGHU D., S/O SMT. PARVATHI, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/AT NO. 96, 14TH MAIN 8TH H CROSS, INDIRA COLONY ATTIGUPPE BENGALURU - 560 040 Digitally signed by GAVRIBIDANUR SUBRAMANYA GUPTA SREENATH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32713 MFA No. 7411 of 2025 2. SMT. NAGARATHNA, W/O HANUMANTHARAYAPPA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS 3. HANMANTHARAYAPPA, S/O LATE MAREGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS BOTH ARE R/AT NO.110 SOUMYA NILAYA, 6TH CROSS 3RD MAIN ROAD, S. K. MAIN ROAD JNYANA JYOTHI NAGARA BENGALURU 560 056. …RESPONDENTS THIS MFA IS FILED U/S.43 RULE 1(r) OF THE CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DT. 23.09.2024 PASSED ON IA NOS. 3 AND 4 IN O.S.NO. 6530/2020 ON THE FILE OF THE XXXIX ADDL. CITY CIVIL & SESSIONS JUDGE (CCH-40), BENGALURU CITY, DISMISSING THE IA.NOS III AND IV FILED UNDER ORDER 39 RULE 1 AND 2 R/W SEC.151 OF CPC, 1908. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR ORAL JUDGMENT None appears when the matter is called out for the second time in the post-lunch session at 03.23 p.m. 2. On perusal of the order sheet, it is seen that when the matter came up before the Court on 17.11.2025, there - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32713 MFA No. 7411 of 2025 was no representation on behalf of appellants and the matter was adjourned. 3. Today, the matter is listed for the 5th time for non- compliance of the objections raised by the Registry. Inspite of the same, there is no representation on behalf of the appellants. It appears that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the matter. 4. In view of the above, this appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE GSS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 11