Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 31342 (PNJ)

RAJNISH KUMAR SHARMA v. STATE OF PUNJAB THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

CWP/21539/2026 · 2026-07-17

Kuldeep Tiwari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

117 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-21539-2026 Date of Decision : 17.07.2026 RAJNISH KUMAR SHARMA ALIAS RAJNISH KUMAR AND ANR .....Petitioners VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Present : Mr. Onkar Singh Batalvi, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Sahil R. Bakshi, AAG, Punjab. KULDEEP TIWARI, J.(Oral) 1. The prayer clothed in the instant writ petition is for issuance of a direction to the respondents to permit the petitioners to participate in the selection process for allotment of vacant stations falling within their respective districts and to allot them new stations on the same terms and conditions as were applicable at the time of their initial joining, along with all consequential benefits, before the transfer/promotion process is finalized. 2. During the course of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners fairly submits that, at this stage, the petitioners would be satisfied in case a direction is issued to the competent authority/ respondent concerned to decide the representation dated 28.03.2026 (Annexure P-2) within a stipulated period. DHARAM VIR 2026.07.20 11:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-21539-2026 -2- 3. Mr. Sahil R. Bakshi, A.A.G., Punjab, who is in receipt of an advance copy of the writ petition and represents the respondents, submits that he has no objection in case a direction is issued to the competent authority/respondent concerned to decide the representation (supra) within a stipulated period. 4. In view of the above, and without evincing any opinion on the merits of the writ petition, this Court deems it appropriate to direct the competent authority/respondent concerned to take a final decision on the representation (supra) by passing a speaking order, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. 5. Liberty is also reserved to the petitioners to seek revival of the instant writ petition in the event the authority fails to comply with the directions issued hereinabove. 6. Disposed of accordingly. (KULDEEP TIWARI) July 17, 2026 JUDGE dharamvir Whether speaking/reasoned. : Yes/No Whether Reportable. : Yes/No DHARAM VIR 2026.07.20 11:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document