[2026:RJ-JP:17158] , HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7172/2026 1. Manoj Kumar Rajwania S/o Kishan Lal, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Plot No. 1, Karni Colony, Ambabadi, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. Ashok Kumar Rajwaniya S/o Late Shri Chhote Lal, Aged About 58 Years, R/o Plot No. 1, Karni Colony, Ambabdi, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretaite Jaipur District Jaipur (Raj.) 2. District Collector, Collector Office, Distirct Ajmer 3. Assistant Land Records Officer Cum Land Management Officer, Tehsil Pishangan, District, Ajmer 4. Sub-Divisional Officer, Tehsil Pishangan, District, Ajmer 5. Tehsildar, Udaipurwati, Tehsil Pishangan, District, Ajmer ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Yogesh Kumar Tailor For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUROOP SINGHI Order 23/04/2026 1. Mr. Yogesh Kumar Tailor, learned counsel for the petitioners, at the very outset, submits that in pursuance to the notice dated 04.12.2025 (Annexure-4) issued by respondent No.3 under Section 114 of the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956, the petitioners were called upon to submit their objections between 05.01.2026 to 09.01.2026, however, the said notice itself was dispatched by the respondent No.3 by way of speed post on [2026:RJ-JP:17158] (2 of 3) [CW-7172/2026] 31.03.2026 only, in support of which, a copy of the speed post receipt dated 31.03.2026 has been annexed as Annexure-5 to the writ petition. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that the said notice was received by the petitioners on 02.04.2026 and immediately thereafter, reply and objections to the abovementioned notice were sent by the petitioners by speed post on 04.04.2026. 3. Learned counsel further submits that once the notices itself were dispatched by the respondent No.3 on 31.03.2026, there was no occasion whatsoever for the petitioners to file any reply to the notice dated 04.12.2025 during the period between 05.01.2026 to 09.01.2026. 4. Learned counsel further submits that till date, no order has been passed by respondent No.3 in pursuance to the notice dated 04.12.2025 and thus, it is prayed that the respondents may consider the reply and objections submitted by the petitioners before taking any decision in pursuance to the notice dated 04.12.2025. 5. Taking note of the aforesaid submissions and also considering the fact that till date, no order has been passed in pursuance to the notice dated 04.12.2025, it would be in the fitness of things to direct the respondent No.3 to consider the reply submitted by the petitioners on 04.04.2026 (Annexure-7) and take any decision on the notice dated 04.12.2025 after taking note of the reply submitted by the petitioners by passing a speaking and reasoned order, strictly in accordance with law in a time bound manner. [2026:RJ-JP:17158] (3 of 3) [CW-7172/2026] 6. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. 7. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. 8. Needless to say, this order has been passed only to consider the petitioners’ reply and take a decision in respect of the notice and in no manner is to be construed as a direction to take decision in a particular manner. (ANUROOP SINGHI),J VINAY /5