HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11879 of 2026 Court No. - 68 HON'BLE ASHUTOSH SRIVASTAVA, J. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record. Heard Shri Vipul Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Arimardan Yadav, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. The present bail application has been filed by the applicant Sandeep with a prayer to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No. 1 of 2026, under Sections 302 (2), 317 (2) B.N.S. Police Station G.R.P. Shamli, District- Shamli, during pendency of trial. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the accused applicant is innocent. He has been falsely implicated in the present case and is languishing in jail since 16.01.2026. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that first information report was lodged against unknown person with the allegation that on the date of incident some unknown person stolen the bike of the first informant from Shamli Station which was registered in the name of the father of the First Informant namely Saleem Ahmad. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant was not named in the first information Report. The applicant was arrested by the police on 15.01.2026 from his house and recovery of the alleged motor cycle has been shown from the possession of the applicant. The recovery is planted one as there is no independent witness of the said recovery. After arguing at some length learned counsel for the applicant submits that in the present case charge sheet has been filed on 21.01.2026 and on 13.03.2026 cognizance has been taken by the court concerned and Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vipul Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sandeep .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) there is no need of further custodial interrogation of the applicant. Criminal history of 15 cases has been properly explained in paragraph no. 23 of the supplementary affidavit filed today and there is no likelihood of his fleeing from course of justice or tampering with evidence in case of release on bail. Hence, bail has been prayed for. Per contra, learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant but could not dispute the aforesaid facts. Considering the nature of the offence, material/evidence brought on record, complicity of the accused, severity of punishment, the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed. Let the applicant-Sandeep, involved in aforesaid case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two local sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the following conditions:- 1. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence. 2. The applicant will not indulge in any criminal activity. 3. The applicant will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses and co-operate in the trial. 4. The applicant will appear regularly on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless his personal appearance is exempted through counsel by the court concerned. In the event of breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the court below will be at liberty to proceed to cancel his bail. May 7, 2026 Deepak/ BAIL No. 11879 of 2026 2 (Ashutosh Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- DEEPAK KUMAR KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad