Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 31325 (PNJ)

VINOD KUMAR JAIN v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/13149/2026 · 2026-07-20

Subhas Mehla, Vikas Bahl

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

128 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-13149-2026 Date of decision: 20.07.2026 VINOD KUMAR JAIN ...PETITIONER V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present: Mr. Sonu Giri, Advocate and Mr. Manthan Pathania, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Saurabh Mago, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Nitin Jain, Advocate for the complainant-Didar Singh. **** VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) On 30.04.2026, a Coordinate Division Bench of this Court was pleased to pass the following order:- “Present: Mr. Sonu Giri, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Saurabh Mago, DAG Haryana for the respondents. **** Annexures P-3 and P-4 appended with the writ petition are illegible. Let legible or typed copies of Annexures P-3 and P-4 be filed before the date fixed. List on 20.07.2026.” MANISHA 2026.07.20 18:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-13149-2026 -2- Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the present petition be disposed of but liberty be granted to the petitioner to revive the same after complying with the order dated 30.04.2026 passed by a Co-ordinate Division Bench of this Court. In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of with liberty aforesaid. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that they will give a copy of revival application to Mr. Nitin Jain, Advocate who is counsel appearing for the complainant-Didar Singh. (VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE (SUBHAS MEHLA) July 20, 2026 JUDGE Manisha (i) Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No (ii) Whether reportable Yes/No MANISHA 2026.07.20 18:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document