1 CGHC010039252022 2026:CGHC:37343 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 197 of 2022 1 - Laharu Ram Manikpuri S/o Shivmangal Manikpuri Aged About 40 Years R/o Village Khaliba, Police Station Gandhinagar, District Sarguja Chhattisgarh. 2 - Smt. Indu Bai Manikpuri W/o Laharu Ram Manikpuri Aged About 38 Years R/o Village Khaliba, Police Station Gandhinagar, District Sarguja Chhattisgarh. ... Appellants versus 1 - Sunil Bari S/o Mulchand Bari Aged About 22 Years R/o Krishna Colony, Sahadol Madhya Pradesh Present Address Makhan Vihar, Bhagwanpur Police Station Gandhinagar Tehsil Ambikapur District Sarguja Chhattisgarh (Driver) 2 - Santosh Kumar Chaddar S/o Suresh Kumar Chaddar Aged About 35 Years R/o Ward 9 Purana Kisan Rice Mill Road, Namnakala Nagar Ambikapur District Sarguja Chhattisgarh. (Owner) 3 - The Branch Manager Shriram General Insurance Company Ltd. Branch Office E-8 Ricco Industrial Area Sitapur, Jaipur (Rajasthan) Pin 302022 Through Branch Manager Shriram General Insurance Company Ltd Branch Office Plot No. 1 4th Floor Maruti Heights Beside R.K. Mall , G Road Raipur Chhattisgarh. (Insurer) ... Respondents For Appellants/Claimants : Mr. A.N. Pandey, Advocate. For Respondents No. 1 & 2 : None. For Respondent No. 3 : Mr. Saurabh Gupta, Adv. on behalf of Mr. Sourabh Sharma, Adv. Digitally signed by HEERA LAL SAHU Date: 2026.08.20 15:43:57 +0530 2 Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal Judgment on Board (20.08.2026) 1. This appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short the "Act of 1988") has been preferred by the appellants/claimants seeking enhancement of the amount of compensation, challenging the impugned award dated 31.08.2021, passed in M.A.C. No.159/2019, whereby the learned Claims Tribunal has awarded a total sum of Rs.8,16,000/- as compensation for the death of Late Tarkeshwar Manikpuri (17 years old), who died in a road accident which took place on 22.03.2019. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant would submit that the learned Claims Tribunal has erred in awarding a lesser amount of compensation in the facts of the case. The Claims Tribunal has assessed the income of the deceased as Rs.5,000/- per month, whereas the minimum wages were 8,140/- per month on the date of the accident i.e. 22.03.2019; therefore, the income of the deceased should be considered on the higher side. The Tribunal has also awarded a lesser amount under other conventional heads, which needs to be enhanced. Therefore, the instant appeal should be allowed, and the compensation awarded by the Claims Tribunal may suitably be enhanced. 3. Learned counsel for respondent No. 3/insurance company supported the impugned award. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and went through the records with utmost circumspection. 5. In the case at hand, the learned Tribunal has indeed taken the monthly income of the deceased to be Rs. 5,000. According to the appellant – Laharu Ram (AW-1), the deceased was aged about 17 years and was a student; he used to earn Rs. 6,000/- per month from agricultural work, but no documents have been produced in support of this fact, hence, it would proper to take his monthly income of Rs.8,140/- as per the Chhattisgarh 3 Minimum Wages Notification issued by the office of Labour Commissioner, Chhattisgarh for unskilled labour. Furthermore, in other conventional heads the Tribunal has granted only Rs.60,000/- which ought to be Rs.1,10,000/-, to that extent the impugned award needs to be modified. 6. Thus, in light of the aforesaid discussion and in light of the judgments of the Supreme Court rendered in the matters of National Insurance Company Ltd. V. Pranay Sethi1, Sarla Verma & Ors. Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation & Ors2 and Magma General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Nanu Ram @ Chuhru Ram & Ors3, this Court is computing the compensation as below:- Sr. No. Heads Compensation awarded by the Tribunal Compensation awarded by this Court 1 Income Rs. 5000 x 12 = 60,000/- Rs. 8,140 x 12 = 97,680/- 2. Future prospect (+)40% (i.e. Rs. 24,000) = 84,000/- (+)40% (i.e. Rs. 39,072) = 1,36,752/- 3. Deduction (-) 1/2 (i.e.42,000) = 42,000/- (-) 1/2 (i.e. 68,376) = 68,376/- 4. Multiplier (x) 18 = 7,56,000/- (x) 18 = 12,30,768/- 5 Other conventional heads Rs. 60,000/- [15,000+15,000+30, 000] Rs. 1,10,000/- [15,000+15,000+(40,00 0x2)] Total Rs. 8,16,000/- Rs. 13,40,768/- 7. In view of the aforesaid analysis, the amount of compensation of Rs.8,16,000/- awarded by the Claims Tribunal is enhanced to Rs.13,40,768/-. Hence, after deducting the amount of Rs.8,16,000/-, the appellants are held entitled for an additional amount of Rs.5,24,768/-. The additional amount of compensation shall carry interest @ 6% per annum from the date of filing of the claim application before the Claims Tribunal till its realization. Rest of the conditions of the impugned award 1 (2017) 16 SCC 680 2 (2009) 6 SCC 121 3 (2018) 18 SCC 130 4 shall remain intact. 8. In the result, the appeal is partly allowed and the impugned award is modified to the extent as indicated herein-above. 9. The Registry is directed to communicate the claimants in writing “the enhanced amount” in this appeal as against the award made by the concerned Tribunal. The said communication be made in Hindi Deonagri language and the help of paralegal workers may be availed with a co-ordination of Secretary, Legal Aid of the concerned area wherein the claimants resides. Sd/- (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Judge H.L. Sahu