Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 31321 (PNJ)

LAKHVIR SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY

CWP/21820/2026 · 2026-07-20

Namit Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

PHHC011171842026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 124 CWP-21820-2026 Date of decision : 20.07.2026 Lakhvir Singh ....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Present: Ms. Deepika Choudhary, Advocate for the petitioner. NAMIT KUMAR J. (Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing respondents No.1 to 3 to forthwith transfer respondent No.4, currently posted as Deputy Chief Engineer, Hoshiarpur, to any other district/place outside his present place of posting in view of his involvement in case FIR No.06 dated 01.02.2025 registered under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 read with Section 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 at Police Station Vigilance Bureau, Range Jalandhar, District Jalandhar (Annexure P-1). 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for redressal of his grievances, the petitioner has also submitted representation dated 13.05.2026 (Annexure P-3) to the respondents which is still pending consideration. He further submits that at this stage, the petitioner would be satisfied, if appropriate directions are issued to the respondents to consider and decide the said representation, by passing a speaking order, in a time bound manner. VINOD KOTHIYAL 2026.07.20 17:06 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document PHHC011171842026 CWP-21820-2026 -2- 3. Notice of motion restricted to respondents No.1 to 3 only at this stage. 4. Mr. Rohit Ahuja, D.A.G., Punjab accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.1 & 2-State. Mr. Manreet Singh Nagra, Advocate has put in appearance and accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.3- PSPCL. They have no objection to the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the record of the case. 6. Without going into the merits of the case at this stage, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3 to consider and decide representation dated 13.05.2026 (Annexure P-3) submitted by the petitioner expeditiously, by passing a speaking order after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, preferably within a period of 02 months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Further, the decision taken thereon shall be conveyed to the petitioner. (NAMIT KUMAR) 20.07.2026 JUDGE kothiyal Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No VINOD KOTHIYAL 2026.07.20 17:06 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document