Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 31317 (CAL)

NILA SEN v. RADHA RAMAN DUTTA & ANR

CRR/2145/2017 · 2026-07-29

Uday Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

08 Ct – 42 jks 29.07.2026 CRR 2145 of 2017 Nila Sen & Anr. Vs. Radha Raman Dutta & Anr. Mr. Nitish Sharma Ms. Sreyashee Mitra … … for the petitioners 1. Learned counsel on behalf of petitioners filed a written instruction of the petitioner no.1 Nila Sen and petitioner no.2 wherein it has been explicitly stated that they do not wish to press or proceed further with the instant revisional application. Let the written instruction be kept on record. 2. Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the present revisional application has been rendered entirely infructuous, as the substratum of the challenge; namely the order dated 19.06.2017 passed in M.P. Case No. 380 of 2014, was issued under Section 144 of Cr.P.C., 1973. 3. In terms of Section 144 (4) of Cr.P.C., 1973 no order passed under this Section can remain in force for more than two months from making thereof, unless the State Government, by notification, directs an extension for a further period (not exceeding six months in total). As several years has elapsed since the date of its issuance, the operational life of the order has long expired. Consequently, it has been exhausted its legal force and completely lost its efficacy due to the efflux of time. 4. I have meticulously examined the materials available on record, which conclusively substantiate and support the contentions raised by the petitioners 5. I have also given my thoughtful consideration to the innocuous and straightforward prayed advanced by the Learned Counsel, keeping in view the statutory time limitations governing order under Section 144 of Cr.P.C. 6. Finding sufficient merit and being fully convinced by the voluntary relinquishment of the pursuits through the formal written instructions, the prayer for withdrawal is hereby accepted. 7. Accordingly, the instant application being C.R.R. No. 2145 of 2017 is hereby dismissed as withdrawn. 8. Any interim order, if subsisting, stands vacated. 9. All connected applications, if any, are consequently disposed of. 10. Photostat copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities. (Uday Kumar, J.) 2