Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 31314 (CAL)

EMDADUL HOQUE v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM (NDPS)/1510/2026 · 2026-07-29

Tirthankar Ghosh

Special Leave Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

AD 89 July 29, 2026 Ct. 35 SG CRM(NDPS) 1510 of 2026 Allowed An application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Kaliachak P.S. Case No.2081 of 2025 dated 20.12.2025 under Sections 21(C)/25/27A/29 of the NDPS Act, 1985. And In the matter of: Emdadul Hoque … petitioner Mr. Abhinaba Patra Ms. Pramita Banerjee … for the petitioner Mr. Kaushik Dey Ms. Pritha Sinha … for the State Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for more than 7 months and the petitioner is similarly situated as the other accused who has been granted bail in CRM(NDPS) 1424 of 2026. As such, the petitioner prays for bail. Learned advocate appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that recovery was made from joint possession of the petitioner and another. Having regard to the fact that the bail was granted principally on the judgment of the Hon’ble the Supreme Court in SLP(Crl.) No.13987 of 2025 (Sentu Seikh vs. State of West Bengal), I am inclined to extend the same benefit to the present petitioner. The petitioner, namely, Emdadul Hoque be released on bail on same terms and conditions as Juyel 2 Hoque @ Juyel Haque who has been granted bail in CRM(NDPS) 1424 of 2026. Thus, CRM(NDPS) 1510 of 2026 is allowed. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)