Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
CGHC010257892026
2026:CGHC:34366
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 902 of 2026 Budharu Das S/o Nohar Das Aged About 60 Years R/o Village Devri Tahsil And District- Sakti (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Budhkunwar W/o Puni Das Aged About 62 Years R/o Village Devri Tahsil And District- Sakti (C.G.) 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Collector Sakti, District- Sakti Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Raj Kumar Sahu, Advocate For Respondent No.1/Caveator : Ms. Juhi Jaiswal, Advocate For Respondent No.2 : Ms. Vaishali Mahilong, Dy.G.A. (Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J.) Order on Board 05/08/2026
1. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the matter is fixed before the Board of Revenue for final hearing, and therefore, he does not want to press the present writ petition, however, SUMIT KUMAR Digitally signed by SUMIT KUMAR Date: 2026.08.05 19:34:33 +0530
2 he would submit that the liberty may be reserved in favour of the petitioner to take recourse to law, if cause of action still survives.
2. The submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner is not opposed by the learned counsel for the respondent No.1 on caveat.
3. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is dismissed as not pressed, with the aforesaid liberty.
4. The Registry is directed to return the certified copy of annexure(s) to the learned counsel for the petitioner after retaining its attested true copy. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) JUDGE Sumit