BAJEER HUSSAIN CHOHAN v. MOHAMMAD ISMAIL JOGAL AND ORS
CM(M)/129/2023 · 2026-09-21
Rajnesh Oswal
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3130 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3130 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
S. No. 32 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
CM(M) 129/2023 CM(3690/2023) BAJEER HUSSAIN CHOHAN …Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Q. R. Shamus, Advocate. Vs.
MOHAMMAD ISMAIL JOGAL AND ORS ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Lone Altaf, Advocate Mr. Sheikh Younis, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE
O R D E R 21.09.2026
1.
Learned counsel for the respondents have very fairly submitted that notwithstanding the plea raised by the petitioner in the present petition, the order impugned to the extent of directing the petitioner to deposit 15% of the suit amount, while granting him the leave to defend the same be set-aside and the learned Trial Court be requested to proceed in accordance with law.
2. In view of the aforesaid submissions made, the impugned order dated 04.05.2023 is set-aside, to the extent it directs the petitioner to deposit 15% of the suit amount for granting him the leave to defend the suit, and the learned Trial Court is requested to expedite the proceedings in the suit in accordance with law.
3.
Disposed of along with connected CM.
(RAJNESH OSWAL)
JUDGE SRINAGAR 21.09.2026 Ishaq
Isaq Hameed Bhat I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 22.09.26