SARVANI INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/533/2026 · 2026-06-16
Harinath N
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3130 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3130 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010004942026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 533/2026 Between:
1. SARVANI INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED, REP BY MANAGING DIRECTOR, P GOPAL REDDY, S/O RAMI REDDY, AGED 53 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 12-455/3/1 A, BYPAAS ROAD OPPOSITE ARAVINDA SCHOOL, KRISHNA NAGAR, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR.522237
2. THE MANGALAGIRI TADEPALLI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 522503
3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, MANGALAGIRI TADEPALLI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT.522503
4. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND PLANNING, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
522237
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ Order or direction more particularly one
2 HN, J
W.P.No.533 of 2026
in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in withholding the payments of pending amounts of Rs.34,04,821/- (Rupees Thirty Four Lakhs Four Thousand Eight Hundred and Twenty One Rupees only) for the year 2022, even after finalizing the bills, payable to the petitioner in relation to the works I. Construction of internal CC Roads at Main Roads at Main Road from Ammisetti Lakshmi Shop D.No.22-2-3 to Ammisetti Govinda Rao 22-3-42 House In Kunchanapalli Area of Mangalagiri Tadepalli municipal Corporation under Special Agreement vide Ho.543/2022-23, Date 22.12.2022 as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 14, and 21 of Constitution of India and Consequentially to direct the respondents to release and pay the bill amounts worth of Rs.34,04,821/- (Rupees Thirty Four Lakhs Four Thousand Eight Hundred and Twenty One Rupees only) with interest @ 24 PERCENT per annum for the delayed amount till date of realization for the works executed by the petitioner and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to Releasing the amounts Rs.34,04,821/- (Rupees Thirty Four Lakhs Four Thousand Eight Hundred and Twenty One Rupees only) payable to him, pending disposal of the write petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. DEVASRI ROSHAN KANCHARLA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV
2.
GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING
3 HN, J
W.P.No.533 of 2026
The Court made the following Order:
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Municipal Administration and Urban Development and learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent Nos.2 & 3. 2. This writ petition is filed against the action of the respondents in withholding the payments of pending amounts of Rs.34,04,821/-, for the year 2022, even after finalizing the bills, payable to the petitioner in relation to the works executed and consequently direct the respondents to release and pay the bill amount of Rs. 34,04,821/- with interest @ 24% per annum for the delayed amount till date of realization for the works executed by the petitioner. 3. Both learned counsel submit that the similar matter is already
disposed of by this court in W.P.No.12701 of 2024 & batch dated
16.07.2025. The operative portion of the said order reads as follows:
“Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents, this Court is of the considered view that the bills due payable to the petitioners for the works executed by them would have to be paid without any further delay. There is no time frame for completion of the vigilance enquiry. That apart the learned Standing Counsel has not submitted on the methodology adopted by the vigilance committee to verify the works completed about five years ago. In so far as the Vigilance Enquiry is concerned, in the event an adverse report against the
4 HN, J
W.P.No.533 of 2026
works completed by the petitioners is arrived at, the respondents shall have the right to proceed against the petitioners in accordance with law. Further, the petitioners shall submit a security bond for the amount released and in case it is found that they are due payable, the department can take appropriate action for recovery of the amount. It is needless to mention that the said exercise shall be completed within a period of eight (08) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.”
4. Following the above order, this Writ Petition is disposed of in terms of the observations and directions in the said order. There shall be no
order as to costs.
5. Registry is directed to append a copy of the order passed by this court in W.P.No.12701 of 2024 & batch dated 16.07.2025 to this order.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N
Dated: 17.06.2026 MSI
5 HN, J
W.P.No.533 of 2026
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
WRIT PETITION NO: 533/2026
Dated: 17.06.2026 MSI