Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 313 (JHR)

JAMSHED ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./1009/2026 · 2026-03-16

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:6915 ) -1- A.B.A. No. 1009 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1009 of 2026 Jamshed Ansari, aged about 28 years, son of Ahmad Ansari, resident of Padarmaniya Birni, P.O. Dwarpahari, P.S. Birni, District- Giridih, Jharkhand … Petitioner -Versus- The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ----- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ----- For the Petitioner : Mrs. Sarweshwari Kumari, Advocate Mr. Venkatesh Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sinha, A.P.P. ----- 02/16.03.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Birni P.S. Case No.154/2025, registered for the offence under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 89, 85, 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023, pending in the Court of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Giridih. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is happened to be the husband of the informant. She further submits that the matter is arising out of the matrimonial dispute. She then submits that there are general and omnibus allegations of assault and demand of dowry. She next submits that the allegation of miscarriage of pregnancy is of the year 2023, whereas, the FIR has been lodged in the year 2025. She also submits that the father-in-law and mother-in-law of the informant have been granted anticipatory bail by the learned Sessions Judge. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposed the prayer and submits that the petitioner is happened to be the husband of the informant and in view of that, the prayer for anticipatory bail may kindly be rejected. ( 2026:JHHC:6915 ) -2- A.B.A. No. 1009 of 2026 5. Considering that the petitioner is the husband of the informant and there are general and omnibus allegations and the alleged allegation of miscarriage of pregnancy is of the year 2023, whereas, the FIR has been lodged in the year 2025 and in that view of the matter, the petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned Court within two weeks from today and the learned Court shall release the petitioner on such terms and conditions as the learned Court may deem fit and proper. 6. Accordingly, this application is disposed of. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated: 16th March, 2026 Ajay/