Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 31296 (CAL)

MADHUSUDAN CHOWDHURY AND ANR. v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/17128/2026 · 2026-07-29

Saugata Bhattacharyya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

29.07.2026 Item no.DL 14 Court No. 05 Asraf, A.R.(Ct.) In the High Court at Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side Case No. WPA 17128 of 2026 In the matter of : MADHUSUDAN CHOWDHURY & ANR. … Petitioners VS. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS. … Respondents For the Petitioners : Mr. Tathagato Majumdar Ms. Neha Chakraborty … Advocates For the State : Mr. Suryaneel Das, Addl. Govt. Pleader Mr. Partha Chakraborty … Advocates For the Respondent no.5 to 8 : Mr. Susnigdho Bhattacharyya … Advocate 1. Affidavit of service filed on behalf of the petitioners is taken on record. 2. Learned advocate representing the petitioners submits that on completion of investigation, report is filed before the Jurisdictional Magistrate. 3. State respondents and respondent nos.5 to 8 are represented by learned advocates. 4. In view of submission made on behalf of the petitioner, no further order need be passed and the writ petition is disposed of. Page 2 5. However, this order shall not preclude the petitioner to approach Jurisdictional Magistrate, if occasion so arises. 6. Urgent photostat certified copies of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance of all necessary formalities. ( Saugata Bhattacharyya, J. )