[2026:RJ-JP:17216] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5668/2026 1. Vishal Bhat S/o Kaluram Bhat, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Maharana Pratap Chowk, Rupangarh, Police Station Rupangarh, District Ajmer (Raj.) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail Ajmer). 2. Shaktiman Bhat S/o Kaluram Bhat, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Maharana Pratap Chowk, Rupangarh, Police Station Rupangarh, District Ajmer (Raj.) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail Ajmer). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Yunus Khan with Mr. Mahesh Kumar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 23/04/2026 1. The petitioners have filed this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.39/2026 registered at Police Station Rupangarh, District Ajmer for offences under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2) and 110 of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard learned counsels for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsels for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in these cases. It is contended that the petitioner Vishal is the real son-in-law of the complainant Sharvan Lal. It is further stated that due to a family dispute between petitioner Vishal and his wife, the FIR has been lodged by the complainant on false and fabricated grounds against [2026:RJ-JP:17216] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-5668/2026] both petitioners. The petitioners also lodged a cross-case against the complainant’s side concerning the same incident in which the petitioners sustained several injuries. It is further submitted that none of the injuries as claimed by the prosecution are dangerous to life. The petitioners are behind the bars since 05.04.2026. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in further custody and consequently, the bail applications deserves to be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 6. Consequently, the bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S. are allowed and it is directed that the petitioners Vishal Bhat S/o Kaluram Bhat and Shaktiman Bhat S/o Kaluram Bhat, be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that each of them shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/70