Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3129 (JK)

WASEEM AKRAM v. UT OF J AND K TH INCHARGE SHO POLICE STATION BAHU FORT JAMMU

Bail App/110/2026 · 2026-09-21

Sanjay Dhar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Sr. No. 16 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU Bail App No. 110/2026 Waseem Akram …. Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through:- Ms. Supriya Chouhan, Advocate vice Mr. S. S. Ahmed, Advocate. V/s UT of J&K and Anr. …..Respondent(s) Through:- None. CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE ORDER 21.09.2026. 1. Nobody has appeared on behalf of the respondents. 2. Reply also has not been filed. 3. The petitioner was granted interim anticipatory bail vide order 22.06.2026. Since, the respondents have neither filed any reply to the application nor anybody has appeared on their behalf today. It seems that the respondents have no objection to the grant of this application. 4. Accordingly, the interim anticipatory bail granted to the petitioner in terms of order dated 22.06.2026 is made absolute subject to the conditions contained in the said order. (Sanjay Dhar) Judge JAMMU 21.09.2026 NEHA-1 Neha Kumari 2026.09.22 10:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document