Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
CGHC010079852025
2026:CGHC:34234
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 243 of 2025 1 - Smt. Nisha Gupta W/o L.K. Gupta Aged About 44 Years R/o New Rajendra Nagar, Vijeta Complex, Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - L.K. Gupta S/o R.L. Gupta Aged About 50 Years R/o New Rajendra Nagar, Vijeta Complex, Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.)
...Appellant(s) versus 1 - Rameshwar S/o Amrit Rao Bhaiyaji Mankar Through Dubey Travels Station Road, Near Fafadih Chowk, Raipur Distt.- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - M/s Dubey Delears, Dubey Travels Station Road, Near Fafadih Chowk, Raipur Distt.- Raipur (C.G.) 3 - National Insurance Company Limited, Through Divisional Manager National Insurance Company Limited G.E. Road, Raipur, (C.G.) 4 - Rohit Kumar Sahu S/o Kondaram Sahu R/o Cherikhedi, Police Station - Mandir Hasaud, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Oriental Insurance Company Limited, Through Divisional Manager, Branch No. 1 Kachahari Chowk, Jail Road, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.)
... Respondent(s) For Appellant(s) : Mr. Kishan Kumar Yadav, Advocaet on behalf of Mr. Awadh Tripathi, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Aakash Shrivastava, Advocate on behalf of Mr. R.N. Pushty, Advocaet Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal Order on Board (05.08.2026)
1. Heard on I.A. No.01 of 2025 an application for condonation of delay VAISHALI LUCKY NAGARIA Digitally signed by VAISHALI LUCKY NAGARIA Date: 2026.08.07 11:05:17 +0530
2 in filing the application for restoration. 2. Upon due consideration and for the reasons assigned in the application, the same is allowed. 3. Delay of 119 days in filing the application for restoration is hereby condoned. 4. Also heard on MCC. 5. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the present MCC has been filed seeking restoration of MAC No. 1539/2016, which was dismissed for want of prosecution on 25.09.2024. 6. I have heard learned counsel for the appellant and perused the records. 7. Upon perusal of the record, it appears that MAC No. 1539/2016 is pending since 2016. It is further evident that the appeal was previously dismissed on 25.09.2024, and no proper attention has been shown on behalf of the appellant. 8. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the reasons stated in the application, the MCC is allowed. Consequently, MAC No. 1539/2016 is directed to be restored to its original number, subject to the payment of costs of ₹2,000/- to High Court Legal Services Authority by cheque within a period of 10 working days from today.
Sd/-
(Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal)
Judge Vaishali