CWP-21203-2026 [1] 141 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-21203-2026 Date of decision: 15.07.2026 M/s Shiv Jyoti Creators Pvt. Ltd. ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present: Mr. Aniket Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, Addl. A.G. Haryana. **** VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1. This is a Civil Writ Petition filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to decide the legal notice dated 25.05.2026 (Annexure P-8). 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner had participated in the auction process conducted by HSIIDC under the provisions of the Haryana Enterprises & Employment Policy, 2020 for allotment of industrial plots at Industrial Estate Dharuhera and as per Advertisement, plot No.113, Sector 15, Industrial Estate Dharuhera was measuring 1012.50 square meters with represented dimensions of 22.50 x 45.00 meters and it is for the said plot that they had deposited the money. It is submitted that the petitioner was the successful bidder but however plot which was initially allotted to him was of 850 square meters and on the representation made by the petitioner, fresh plot has been allotted to him which is 1060.26 PAWAN KUMAR 2026.07.17 09:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document CWP-21203-2026 [2] square meters instead of advertised 1012.50 square meters. It is submitted that the petitioner is not satisfied with the said plot as area of the same is more than the area which was advertised and the shape of the said plot is quadrilateral instead of being rectangular. It is submitted that for the redressal of his grievance, the petitioner through his counsel has sent legal notice dated 25.05.2026 (Annexure P-8) to respondent No.2 and at this stage, the petitioner would be satisfied in case respondent No.3 is directed to decide the same in a time bound manner. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents has submitted that the said legal notice dated 25.05.2026 would be considered and decided by respondent No.3 within a period of three months from today after hearing the petitioner or his representatives and in case the pleas of the petitioner are found to be meritorious then necessary relief would also be granted to the petitioner. 4. Keeping in view the abovesaid facts and circumstances, the present writ petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.3 to consider and decide legal notice dated 25.05.2026 by passing a speaking order within a period of three months from today. In case, respondent No.3 finds that the pleas raised by the petitioner are meritorious then necessary relief would also be granted to the petitioner expeditiously. (VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE (SUBHAS MEHLA) JUDGE 15.07.2026 Pawan Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No PAWAN KUMAR 2026.07.17 09:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document