Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3127 (MAD)

M/S TEJA INDUSTRIES, Represented by its Partner Mr.Mandeep Singh Malik v. MOHAMMED SHAFFI A R

A/1615/2026 · 2026-04-22

Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

A No. 1615 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 22-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY A No. 1615 of 2026 in C.S.(Comm.Div.) DR.No.13408 of 2026 M/S TEJA INDUSTRIES, Represented by its Partner Mr.Mandeep Singh Malik No 8 Ayyencherry Village Urapakam Kanchipuram District 603 210. ..Applicant(s) Vs Mohammed Shaffi A R No.165/7, 9th Cross, Old Guddahda Halli, Bangalore 560 026. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Judges summons issued under Order XIV Rule 8 and Order III Rule 1 of OS Rules read with Clause 12 of Letter’s Patent, praying to grant leave to institute suit against the Defendant. For Applicant(s): Mr.M.Aravindh Subramaniam Senior Counsel for Ms.Monica Chopda ORDER In a proposed suit for remedies in respect of alleged infringement of trademark and passing off, the intending plaintiff has applied to grant leave to institute the suit against the defendant. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A No. 1615 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 2 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. JER 2. Learned Senior Counsel for the plaintiff has handed over a copy of an invoice containing the impugned marks and evidencing commercial sale at Chennai. 3. Upon considering the aforesaid, it appears that atleast part of cause of action arose within the jurisdiction of this Court. Therefore, this application is allowed, by granting leave to the applicant to sue the respondent before this Court. The Registry is directed to number the suit, if it is otherwise in order. 22-04-2026 Jer A No. 1615 of 2026 in C.S.(Comm.Div.) DR.No.13408 of 2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis