CWP-20960-2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 132 CWP-20960-2026 Date of decision: 15.07.2026 Somvir Singh & anr. ...Petitioners VERSUS State of Haryana & ors. ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present :- Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Pradeep Prakash Chahar, Addl.AG, Haryana. Mr. Rajesh Lamba, Advocate for respondent No.5. VIKAS BAHL , J. (Oral) 1. Present petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India has been filed for issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari for setting aside the order dated 15.04.2026 (Annexure P-10) passed by respondent No.2 and order dated 12.09.2024 (Annexure P-8) passed by respondent No.3 and order dated 16.08.2017 (Annexure P-4) passed by respondent No.4, whereby the eviction orders have been passed. 2. On 14.07.2026, this Court was pleased to pass the following order:- “Present: Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Pradeep Prakash Chahar, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. Learned counsel for the respondents/State has pointed out that the original eviction order is not against the MONIKA VERMA 2026.07.17 10:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment chandigarh CWP-20960-2026 -2- petitioners and has further submitted that even the sale deed dated 03.05.2023 is not in favour of the petitioners. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that inadvertently the sale deed in favour of the petitioners has not been annexed with the present petition. It is submitted that on the first aspect, he would seek instructions. Adjourned to 15.07.2026.” 3. Learned counsel for respondent No.5-Gram Panchayat has submitted that the Gram Panchayat has filed a suit against the present petitioners and other persons and said suit is pending. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that in view of the same, the petitioners be permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to raise all the pleas which are available to them in the said suit and in case any cause arises, then they would file an independent suit also. 5. Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 6. It is made clear that this Court has not opined on the rights of the petitioners and the Gram Panchayat and the same would be considered independently by the concerned Court where the suits/proceedings are pending. (VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE 15.07.2026 (SUBHAS MEHLA) monika JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Y es/No Whether reportable : Y es/No MONIKA VERMA 2026.07.17 10:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment chandigarh