Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 31267 (CHH)

SMT. NOOTAN DHRUW v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/3771/2024 · 2026-08-05

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010246082024 2026:CGHC:34634 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3771 of 2024 1 - Smt. Nootan Dhruw W/o. Sujeet Kosle Aged About 32 Years Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat, Mura, Janpad Panchayat, Tilda-Nevra, District - Raipur (C.G.). ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through - The Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Nawa Raipur (C.G.). 2 - The Collector Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.). 3 - The Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue)/specified Officer (Panchayat) Tilda-Nevra, District - Raipur (C.G.). 4 - The Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat, Tilda-Nevra, District - Raipur (C.G.). 5 - Parmeshwar Yadav S/o. Bisahu Yadav Aged About 38 Years R/o. Ward No. 6, Bajrang Chowk, Budera, Kharora, District - Raipur (C.G.). 6 - Sanjay Verma S/o. Nandkumar Verma Aged About 38 Years R/o. Ward No. 14, Bajrang Chowk, Mura, District - Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Vidhi Matlani, Advocate. For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Abhyudhay Tripathi, Advocate. For Respondents No. 5 & 6 : Mr. Kamlesh Patel, Advocate. RAGHVENDRA JAT Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 06/08/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset, submits that the petitioner has completed her tenure as such the petitioner does not want to pursue this petition. 2. Prayer made is fair and reasonable. 3. No objection has been raised from other sides. 4. In view of above submission, the petition is dismissed for want of instructions. 5. However, the petitioner is at liberty to file an appropriate petition in case exigency arises. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat