Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 31254 (PAT)

Mohit Anand v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./6167/2026 · 2026-02-04

Partha Sarthy

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6167 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-202 Year-2025 Thana- Kharagpur District- Munger ====================================================== Mohit Anand S/o Late Raghuvir Sharan Rai @ Raghuwar Sharan Ray R/o village/muhalla- Banbarsa, P.S - kharagpur, District - Munger ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. The Union of India ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjiv Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pawan Kumar Chaurasia, APP Dr. Krishna Nandan Singh (ASG) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 2 04-02-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with N.D.P.S Case no.9 of 2025, arising out from Kharagpur P.S. Case no.202 of 2025 registered under sections 8(c) and 21(b) of the N.D.P.S. Act and section 7 of the Lotteries Act, 1998. 3. As per the prosecution case, 30 purias of smack was recovered from the possession of six named accused persons including the petitioner herein as also co-accused Abhishek Kumar. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. No incriminating article has been recovered from his possession. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6167 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026 2/2 The case of the petitioner stands on a similar footing to that of co-accused Abhishek Kumar who has been enlarged on bail vide order dated 21.1.2026 passed Cr. Misc. no.3570 of 2026. The petitioner is in custody since 9.9.2025 and has no criminal antecedent. Chargesheet has been submitted in the case. 5. The application for bail is opposed by learned A.P.P for the State. 6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegations against the petitioner in the FIR, grant of bail to the similarly situated co-accused vide aforesaid order dated 21.1.2026, the petitioner not having any criminal antecedent, his being in custody since 9.9.2025 and chargesheet having been submitted in the case, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with N.D.P.S Case no.9 of 2025, arising out from Kharagpur P.S. Case no.202 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge, Munger. Shiv/- (Partha Sarthy, J) U T