Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3125 (CHH)

SANJAY KUMAR KORRAM v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/12637/2025 · 2026-01-01

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:24 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 12637 of 2025 1 - Sanjay Kumar Korram S/o Shri Sukha Singh Korram Aged About 36 Years Working As Panchayat Secretary, Janpad Panchayat- Kondagaon, R/o Village- Ranapal, Tahsil- Mardapal, Distt.- Kondagaon (C.G.) ... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Panchayat And Social Welfare Department, Mahanadi Bhavan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Director Panchayat And Social Welfare, Indrawati Bhanan Atal Nagar, New Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The Deputy Director Panchayat And Social Welfare Kondagaon Distt. Kondagaon (C.G.) 4 - The Collector Kondagaon Distt. Kondagaon (C.G.) 5 - The Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat, Kondagaon, Distt. Kondagaon (C.G.) 6 - The Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat, Kondagaon, Distt. Kondagaon (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Manoj Kumar Sinha, Advocate For Respondents/State : Mr. Santosh Bharat, Panel Lawyer [ SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD 2 02/01/2026 1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking for the following relief(s):- “10.1. That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records of the petitioner’s case. 10.2 That the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the Respondent authorities to pay the salary from the month of November, 2012 to February 2018 total amount of salary which is pending is Rs. 7,54,679/- to the petitioner with interest of 18% as per rules. 10.3 That, the Hon’ble Court be further pleased to direct the Respondent authorities to consider and decide the representation dated 10.06.2025 (Annexure P/4) submitted by the petitioner regarding grant of pending salary to the petitioner as per rules. 10.4 Any other order that the Hon’ble Court deems fit and necessary in the circumstances of the case be also passed. 10.5 That the cost of the petition be also awarded to the petitioner.” 2. After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition at this stage with liberty to file better constituted petition clarifying all the facts. 3. In view of the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. 4. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Dey SHUBHAM DEY Digitally signed by SHUBHAM DEY Date: 2026.01.02 17:54:03 +0530