Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
29.07.2026 Court No.35 Item No.75 ssi CRM (NDPS) 1491 of 2026
In Re: - An application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Suraksha Nagarik Sanhita in connection with Bhagwangola Police Station Case No. 197 of 2025 dated 23.04.2025 under Sections 21 (C)/ 22 (c)/29 of the NDPS Act. And In the matter of: Bulet Sk. …. Petitioner.
Ms. Shabana Hasin …for the petitioner Mr. Somopriya Choudhury Mr. Shayan Sachin Basu
..for the State
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for about 74 days. Charge sheet has already been submitted. The petitioner surrendered before the learned trial Court and there is no recovery from the present petitioner.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner was rejected. The quantum of recovery in the present case is 3178 grams of yaba tablet and 3289 grams of brown sugar. However, learned advocate submits that so far as the materials in the case diary are concerned, the same relates to the statement of a co- accused as the petitioner fled away from the spot when the seizure was made.
Having regard to the fact that the case against the petitioner is based on the statement of a co-accused, I am of the opinion that further detention of the present petitioner is unwarranted. As such, the prayer for bail is allowed.
2
Accordingly, the petitioner, namely, Bulet Sk shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties of Rs. 10,000/- each, one of whom must be local to the satisfaction of the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge under NDPS Act, 2nd Court, Berhampore Murshidabad. If on bail, the petitioner shall be physically present on each and every date before the learned trial Court and shall not leave the district of Murshidabad without prior permission of the learned special Court.
Thus, CRM (NDPS) 1491 of 2026 is allowed.
Memo of evidence submitted by the State be kept with the record.
All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)