Saravanan @ Mukesh v. The State rep by, The Inspector of police
CRL OP/14008/2026 · 2026-06-05
C Kumarappan
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 31232 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 31232 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Crl.O.P.No.14008 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 05.06.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Crl.O.P.No.14008 of 2026 Saravanan @ Mukesh ... Petitioner Vs. The State represented by The Inspector of Police, Kolathur Police Station, Chennai District. (Crime No.19 of 2021) ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, praying to enlarge the petitioner anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.19 of 2021 pending investigation on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Parthiban For Respondent : Mrs.R.S.Indira, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) O R D E R The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 3(2)a, 4(1) and 5(1)a of Immoral Traffic Prevention Act, in Crime No.19 of 2021, on the file of the respondent Police, seeks anticipatory bail. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.14008 of 2026
2. The case of the prosecution is that, based on an advertisement offering women for prostitution found on the Locanto App, the respondent police conducted a raid and found certain persons allegedly involved in fresh trade activities. Hence, the case.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and that he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to co-operate with the investigation. Hence, he prayed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and opposed the anticipatory bail application.
5. Taking into consideration of the totality of the circumstances, this Court is of the firm view that the offence allegedly committed by the petitioner has serious societal impact. Hence enlarging the petitioner on anticipatory bail at this stage would affect the moral fiber of the society at 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.14008 of 2026 large. In such view of the position, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail.
6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. 05.06.2026 cda To 1.The XIII Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai. 2.The Inspector of Police, Kolathur Police Station, Chennai District. 3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.14008 of 2026 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. cda Crl.O.P.No.14008 of 2026 05.06.2026
4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis