APHC010162032026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WRIT APPEAL NO: 364 of 2026 Bench Sr.No:- 75 [3580] Smt. Ch. Nari Venkata Padmaja, and Others ...Appellant(s) Vs. A S Lakshmi Narasimha Bharani and Others ...Respondent(s) ********** Advocate for Appellant: Mr. Madhava Rao Nalluri Advocate(s) for Respondent(s): Mr. Thathireddy Ashok Srivastava; - R1 to R6 GP for Municipal Administration and Urban Development – R7 Mr. T. Karthik representing Mr. Somisetty Ganesh Babu, Standing Counsel for VUDA and MUDA; - R8 CORAM :THE CHIEF JUSTICE LISA GILL SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO DATE : 18th June 2026 LISA GILL, CJ: This appeal has been filed by applicants/appellants challenging interlocutory order, dated 17.07.2025, passed in W.P. No.12051 of 2025, which reads as under: “Post the matter on 31.07.2025. In the meanwhile, status-quo as on today to be maintained with regard to the possession.” 2 HCJ & RRR, J W.A. No:364 of 2026 2. Learned counsel for applicants submits that present applicants are members of Mytri Nagar Association, which is arrayed as respondent No.11 in writ appeal and respondent No.5 in writ petition. Counter to writ petition, it is stated, has been filed by said Association but interest of present applicants/appellants has not been taken care of and complete facts have not been disclosed before learned writ Court. 3. It is submitted that Judgment and Decree dated 11.07.2024, passed by learned Principal Civil Judge (Senior Division), Visakhapatnam, in O.S. No.726 of 2014, in favour of present applicants and against Sri D.V. Maharshi, who is stated to be GPA holder of the writ petitioners has not been brought to notice of learned Single Bench, whereas it is extremely relevant material for adjudication of the present matter. It is thus prayed that in view of facts and circumstances, the impugned interlocutory order be suitably modified. 4. We have heard learned counsel and have perused file. 5. Admittedly, present applicants are not parties before learned writ Court in their individual capacity. It is the Association of which they are members that has been impleaded as a party. The facts and circumstances as well as various factual aspects, which are raised before us, can very well be placed before learned single Bench by filing appropriate application(s) by applicants. 6. At this stage, we do not find any ground to cause interference in interlocutory order, dated 17.07.2025. Liberty is afforded to applicants to file appropriate application(s) before learned single Bench for being impleaded 3 HCJ & RRR, J W.A. No:364 of 2026 and to place on record the facts and issues sought to be raised in the present appeal. Writ Appeal is, accordingly, disposed of. There is no expression of opinion on merits of the matter. No costs. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. LISA GILL, CJ R RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J akn 4 HCJ & RRR, J W.A. No:364 of 2026 HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE LISA GILL, CHIEF JUSTICE & HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO Writ Appeal No: 364 of 2026 DATE : 18.06.2026 AKN 64