Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 31219 (KAR)

KALLENGADA P SOMAIAH (SOMAIAH K P) v. THE CANARA BANK

WP/32970/2025 · 2026-07-27

Jyoti M

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010709182025 NC: 2026:KHC:38656 WP No. 32970 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 32970 OF 2025 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: KALLENGADA P.SOMAIAH (SOMAIAH K.P.,) AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, S/O. LATE K.A.POOVAIAH, HYSODLUR VILLAGE AND POST, PONNAMPET TALUK, KODAGU DISTRICT, KARNATAKA-571 249. REPRESENTED BY ITS SPA HOLDER K.V.PONNANNA, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, S/O K.C.VISHWANATHA, RESIDENT OF HYSODLURR VILLAGE, PONNAMPET TALUK, KODAGU DISTRICT-571 249. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. AJAY N., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE CANARA BANK REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR HEAD OFFICE, 112, J.C.ROAD, BENGALURU-560002. 2. CANARA BANK, REPRESENTED BY ITS Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010709182025 NC: 2026:KHC:38656 WP No. 32970 of 2025 AUTHORISED OFFICER, PONNAMPET BRANCH, PONAMPET-571216. 3. CANARA BANK, ASSET RECOVERY AND MANAGEMENT BRANCH (ARM BRANCH), CANARA BANK BUILDING, BALMATTA ROAD, HAMPANKATTA, MANGALURU-575001. REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY, MR. GIJESH KUMAR, REGISTERED UNDER COMPANIES ACT, 1970. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. MOUNIKA M., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. K.V.LOKESH, ADVOCATE FOR C/R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Ajay N., counsel for the petitioner and Smt.Mounika M., counsel on behalf of Sri.K.V.Lokesh, for caveator / respondent No.3 appeared in person. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010709182025 NC: 2026:KHC:38656 WP No. 32970 of 2025 Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition may be dismissed as not pressed. When queried, counsel for the petitioner submits that a conscious decision is taken about non pressing of the petition and if an order is passed the petitioner shall not seek review of the order or modification of the order. The oral submission is placed on record. As the counsel on record has taken a conscious decision about the non pressing of the petition, the Writ Petition is dismissed as not pressed. Because of dismissal of the Writ Petition, all pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of. Sd/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17