( 2026:JHHC:9964 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 2491 of 2026 ------ Boomkar Choudhary @ Bamkar Choudhary @ Pankaj Kumar Choudhary @ Choudhary @ Boomkar Choudhary, aged about 37 years, s/o Shakti Pada Kumar Choudhary, r/o Village- Bazarsai, Kharsawan, P.O.+P.S.-Kharsawan, Dist.-Seraikella, Jharkhand … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Manoj Kr. Choubey, Advocate : Mr. Madhav Prasad, Advocate For the State : Mr. Abhay Kr. Tiwari, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 08.04.2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Dhanbad P.S. Case No.441 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under sections 103(1)/61(2)/3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and under Section 27 of Arms Act. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons and in criminal conspiracy with them has committed the murder of Md. Sahabuddin Siddiqui. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and the petitioner has been implicated in this case only on the basis of the confessional statement of the co-accused person and he is not named in the FIR. It is then submitted that without putting the petitioner on T.I. Parade as mentioned in paragraph no. 15 of the bail application, charge sheet has already been submitted against the petitioner on 04.03.2026. It is next submitted that at present the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as in one case in which he has been involved has ended up in acquittal. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 06.12.2025, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 01 of the bail application and no witness has been examined as yet. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the abovenamed petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Dhanbad, in connection with Dhanbad P.S. Case No.441 of 2024 with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 08.04.2026 Gunjan-