Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3121 (BOM)

VISHAL RAMESH TALOSKAR AND ANR v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

WP/2916/2026 · 2026-06-25

Shri Ashwin D Bhobe

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

P-1-WP-2916-2026.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2916 OF 2026 Vishal Ramesh Taloskar & Anr. … Petitioners Versus. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. … Respondents ----- Mr. P. Y. Shankar a/w Mr. N. Khan, Advocates for Petitioners. Mr. Soutrik Kar i/b Ms. Racheeta Dhuru, Advocates for Respondent No. 2. Ms. A. S. Gotad, APP for Respondent – State. ------- CORAM : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J. DATE : 30th JUNE, 2026 P.C. : 1. This praecipe is circulated for Speaking to the Minutes, same is marked with ‘X’ for identification. 2. Mr. P. Y. Shankar, learned Advocate for the Petitioners submits that there is a typographical error in the 2nd paragraph at the 4th line, thereafter in the 4th paragraph at the 3rd last line, and in the 14th paragraph at the 5th line while making a reference to Gayatri shimpi 1 GAYATRI RAJENDRA SHIMPI Digitally signed by GAYATRI RAJENDRA SHIMPI Date: 2026.07.01 19:36:54 +0530 P-1-WP-2916-2026.doc the proceedings bearing “R.C.C. No. 158 of 2019”. He submits that instead of mentioning the said number, there is a typographical error by which the proceedings are referred to as “R.C.C. No. 158 of 2029”. 3. Mr. Soutrik Kar, learned Advocate for Respondent No. 2 and Ms. A. S. Gotad, learned APP for Respondent No. 1 - State do not oppose the said request. 4. In view of the same, the order dated 25.06.2026 passed in Criminal Writ Petition No. 2916 of 2026 be corrected in terms of the typographical errors pointed out in the praecipe (X) and the corrected order be uploaded. 5. Praecipe (X) disposed of. (ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.) Gayatri shimpi 2