Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3121 (ALL)

YADUNATH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/17374/2026 · 2026-05-04

Manish Kumar Nigam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 17374 of 2026 Court No. - 36 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: " Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no.2 to decide Case No. 934 of 2018 (Old Case No. 70 of 2010) (Balram Yadav and another Vs. Yadunath and others) pending before him since 30.04.2010 within specified period." 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that aforementioned case is pending consideration and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously. 4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to respondent No. 2 to consider and decide the aforementioned case, in accordance with law, expeditiously, after ensuring service upon all the opposite parties, giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. May 5, 2026 Nitika Sri. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Awadhesh Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Kumar Gupta (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Yadunath And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad