2026:JHHC:2429 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 552 of 2023 1. Israil Ansari, aged about 61 years, Son of Late Hakimjan Mian, 2. Manjur Mian, aged about 60 years, Son of Late Hakimjan Mian, 3. Habib Mian, aged about 66 years, Son of Hakimjan Mian 4. Janab Ansari, aged about 44 years, Son of Late Israil Ansari 5. Harun Ansari, aged about 51 years, Son of Late Israil Ansari 6. Shahabuddin Ansari, aged about 28 years, Son of Late Israil Ansari 7. Akhtar Ansari, aged about 39 years, Son of Shri Liyakat Ali 8. Sarfaraj Ansari, aged about 35 years, Son of Shri Liyakat Ansari 9. Bablu @ Jabir Ansari, aged about 40 years, Son of Shri Liyakat Ansari 10. Akhtab Ansari, aged about 32 years, Son of Shri Manjur Ansari 11. Anwar Ansari, aged about 41 years, Son of Late Shakur Mian 12. Yakub Ansari, aged about 45 years, Son of Late Shakur Mian 13. Shahnawaj Ansari, aged about 13 years, Son of Shri Shamshul Ansari All are resident of Village-Mundradih, P.O. & P.S. Bengabad, District- Giridih (Jharkhand). … … … Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Ishaque Mian, Son of Late Rojan Mian 3. Rustam Ansari, Son of Shri Ishaque Mian. 4. Gafur Mian, Son of Late Talo Mian 5. Kalim Ansari, Son of Late Talo Mian 6. Abbas Ansari, Son of Shri Gafur Mian 7. Waris Ansari @ Sonu, Son of Shri Gafur Mian 8. Jakir Ansari, Son of Shri Asgar Mian 9. Jalal @ Jalwa, Son of Shri Asgar Mian 10. Asgar Mian, Son of Late Shahnawaz Mian 11. Ramjan Ansari, Son of Shri Ishaque Mian 12. Latif Ansari, Son of Shri Mehar Mian 13. Sadam Ansari, Son of Late Shamid Mian 14. Khalil Mian, Son of Late Jainul Mian 15. Hasnain @ Bablu Ansari, Son of Shri Khalil Mian Opposite Parties Nos. 2 to 15 are resident of Village-Mundradih, P.O., P.S. & District-Giridih (Jharkhand). … … ... Opp. Parties --------- 2026:JHHC:2429 CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY --------- For the Petitioner: Mr. Sumit Prakash, Advocate For the State Mr. Bhola Nath Ojha, Spl.P.P. For the opposite parties: Mr. Sudhir Kumar, Advocate --------- 05/Dated: 29.01.2026 Heard parties. Learned counsel for the petitioners seek permission of this Court to withdraw the Cr.M.P. as the period for which order under section 144 of Code of Criminal Procedure was passed in favour of the petitioners is already over and thus the prayer has become infructuous. Accordingly, this Cr.M.P. is dismissed as withdrawn. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated: 29.01. 2026 MM Uploaded on:- 03/02/2026 Cp.03