Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 31197 (KAR)

SRI PADMANNA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/19664/2026 · 2026-07-20

E S Indiresh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010433812026 NC: 2026:KHC:36994 WP No. 19664 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.19664 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. PADMANNA S/O VENKATARAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/AT NO.102/1, VENKATASHAMAPPA LAYOUT, MANORAYANAPALYA, HEBBALA, BENGALURU - 560 024. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. M.B. CHANDRA CHOODA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE TAHASILDAR BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, K.G.ROAD, KANDAYA BHAVAN, BENGALURU - 560 009. Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010433812026 NC: 2026:KHC:36994 WP No. 19664 of 2026 3. THE ASST. COMMISSIONER BENGALURU NORTH SUB-DIVISION, K G ROAD, KANDAYA BHAVAN, BENGALURU - 560 009. 4. SHAHEED S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, MAJOR IN AGE. 5. SRINIVASA S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, MAJOR IN AGE. 6. RIZWAN PASHA S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, MAJOR IN AGE. 7. SUSHMA W/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGE MAJOR, 8. MEGHANA W/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, MAJOR IN AGE. 9. SRINIVAS S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, MAJOR IN AGE. 10. G S ASHOK KUMARA SHETTY S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, MAJOR IN AGE. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010433812026 NC: 2026:KHC:36994 WP No. 19664 of 2026 11. RAMAKKA W/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, MAJOR IN AGE. 12. NAGARAJU S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGE MAJOR. 13. BALU S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, MAJOR IN AGE. 14. IQBAL AHAMED S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, MAJOR IN AGE. 15. ASIYA BEGUM W/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, MAJOR IN AGE. 16. MANJULA @ MANJU W/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, MAJOR IN AGE. 17. MANJULA @ MANJU W/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, MAJOR IN AGE. 18. ALAHEEK S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, MAJOR IN AGE. - 4 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010433812026 NC: 2026:KHC:36994 WP No. 19664 of 2026 19. AKBARI MAZID FRONT S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, MAJOR IN AGE. 20. MANJUNATHA S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, MAJOR IN AGE. 21. SUVARNA T.C. W/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, MAJOR IN AGE. 22. SRINIVASA MURTHY S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, MAJOR IN AGE. 23. ANKAPPA REDDY S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, MAJOR IN AGE RESPONDENTS NO.4 TO 23 ARE R/AT CHOLANAYAKANAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU-560032. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SPOORTHY HEGDE N., HCGP FOR R1 TO R3; NOTICE TO R4 TO R23 IS DISPENSED WITH) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 06/07/2023 PASSED BY THE TAHASILDAR, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, IN CASE - 5 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010433812026 NC: 2026:KHC:36994 WP No. 19664 of 2026 NO.NCR/K/CR/114/2022-23 VIDE ANNEXURE-D, IN SO FAR IT RELATES TO THE PROPERTY NO.117, KATHA NO.96-258-117 SITUATED AT 3RD CROSS, CHAMUNDINAGAR, WARD NO.33, MANORAYANAPALYA, KASABA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, MEASURING EAST-WEST 40 FT, AND NORTH-SOUTH 30 FT., CONSIST OF THREE STORIED BUILDING WHICH IS FORMED OUT OF SY. NO.70 OF CHOLANAYAKANAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, BY ISSUE OF WRIT OF CERTIORARI; AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER 1. In this Writ Petition, petitioner is assailing the order dated 06.07.2023 in case No.NCR/K/CR/114/2022-23(Annexure-D) passed by respondent No.2 in respect of the subject property, inter alia, sought for a direction to respondent No.3 to dispose of the appeal bearing No.RA/BNT-13/2024 (Annexure-F), and to quash the notice produced at Annexure-F. - 6 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010433812026 NC: 2026:KHC:36994 WP No. 19664 of 2026 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner by referring to the order at Annexure-D passed by respondent No.2, submitted that the petitioner herein has not been heard in the matter before passing the impugned order and accordingly, sought for interference of this Court. 3. Learned Additional Government Advocate sought to justify the impugned order. 4. In the light of the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties, the impugned order in case No.NCR/K/CR/114/2022-23 dated 06.07.2023 (Annexure-D) is required to be set aside as the petitioner has not been heard in the matter before passing the order. In that view of the matter, I am of the view that, the matter requires reconsideration and accordingly, remitted to respondent No.2 to reconsider the matter afresh after issuing notice to the petitioner and take decision in accordance with law by providing fair opportunity to the petitioner. 5. It is also made clear that as the order dated 06.07.2023(Annexure-D) is set aside, no further orders are - 7 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010433812026 NC: 2026:KHC:36994 WP No. 19664 of 2026 required to be made on the notice at Annexure-F issued by respondent No.3. Accordingly, the entire proceedings before respondent No.3 does not survive for consideration. 6. With this observation, the Writ Petition is disposed of. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21