Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3118 (GAU)

SURESH DAS v. SMTI POMI BARUAH ACS AND ORS

I.A.(Civil)/1115/2026 · 2026-04-06

Nelson Sailo

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010068122026 2026:GAU-AS:5152 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1115/2026 SURESH DAS S/O- JPOGESWAR DAS , R/O- BHAGADUTTA PATH, GEETANAGAR, P.S- GEETANAGAR, GUWAHATI, DIST- KAMRUP(M), ASSAM, PIN-781021 VERSUS SMTI POMI BARUAH ACS AND ORS DIRECTOR OF HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, ASSAM, KAHILI PARA, GUWAHATI-19 2:AMARENDRA KALITA PRINCIPAL LALIT CHANDRA BHARALI COLLEGE MALIGAON GUWAHATI ASSAM 3:SMTI SUMITRA DEV AES DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT ASSAM KAHILI PARA GUWAHATI-1 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. B P BORAH, MR H MAZUMDER Advocate for the Respondent : SC, HIGHER EDU, MR. S K MUKTAR Page No.# 2/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NELSON SAILO ORDER Date : 07-04-2026 Heard Mr. BP Borah, learned counsel for the applicant/petitioner, who submits that by filing this interlocutory application, the applicant seeks impleadment of Smti. Sumitra Dev, AES, Deputy Director of Higher Education Department as respondent No. 3 in the connected Cont.Cas(C) 260/2024, in view of the fact that the said person had issued a show-cause notice to the applicant after the passing of the speaking order. [2.] The learned counsel submits that vide judgment and order dated 19.10.2023 passed in WP(C) 2555/2020, liberty was granted to the official respondents to initiate departmental proceedings, as per the procedure prescribed by the Rules, if so advised within a period of 3 (three) months. Pursuant thereto, the speaking order was passed and off late a show-cause notice was issued to the applicant and as such, the impleadment is necessary for effective compliance of the Court’s direction. [3.] Mr. S Das, learned counsel appears for the respondent No. 1 and submits that he has no objection if the impleadment application is allowed andMr. SK Muktar, learned counsel appears for the respondent No. 2 and also agrees to the submission of the respondent No. 1. [4.] In view of above, impleadment of Smti. Sumitra Dev, AES, Deputy Director of Higher Education Department as respondent No. 3 in Cont.Cas(C) 260/2024 Page No.# 3/3 is hereby allowed, as prayed for. [5.] Interlocutory application stands disposed of as allowed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant