Shiv Shankar Kumar @ Ravi Shankar Kumar v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./2959/2026 · 2026-02-13
Prabhat Kumar Singh
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 31177 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 31177 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2959 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-192 Year-2025 Thana- MINAPUR District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Shiv Shankar Kumar @ Ravi Shankar Kumar S/o- Bali Sah Village- Nurchhapra PS-Rampurhari Dist- Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anuj Kumar Shrivastava, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 13-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Minapur P. S. Case No. 192 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 103(1), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
3. As per prosecution case, three named accused persons, including this petitioner along with four other accused persons, took away son of the informant from his house and on the next morning, his dead body along with his motorcycle was found by the roadside.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at best, it is a case of last seen with the deceased. There is no eye witness to the occurrence and during investigation, no one has
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2959 of 2026(2) dt.13-02-2026 2/2 claimed to have seen this petitioner committing the alleged offence. Similarly situated co-accused, namely, Arun Kumar has already been granted regular bail by this Court vide order dated 09.12.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 73465 of 2025. Charge- sheet has already been submitted. Petitioner claims clean antecedent and is in custody since 21.11.2025.
5. However, learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the bail application.
6. Considering the nature of accusation, clean antecedent, period of custody and the fact that charge-sheet has already been submitted, this bail application is allowed. The petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Court No. 8, Muzaffarpur (East), Muzaffarpur in connection with Minapur P. S. Case No. 192 of
2025.
Navya/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T