- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010435012025 NC: 2026:KHC:38414 WP No. 19220 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 19220 OF 2025 (GM-CON) BETWEEN: AMRITH SHENOY P AGED 44 YEARS S/O LATE DR.ANANTHA SHENOY PROPRIETOR SRI. LAKSHMEE HOMES AND INFRASTRUCTURE DOOR NO.6-2-137A3 GROUND FLOOR, ANANTHA COMMERCIAL COMPLEX, P.RANGANATHA SHENOY COMPOUND, VOLAKADU, UDUPI - 576 101. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SUDESH KUMAR ACHARYA., ADVOCATE) AND: SANTHOSH PAI AGED 41 YEARS S/O VIVEKANANDA PAI R/AT FLAT NO.104, SAIRADHA PARADISE, CBS ROAD, AJJARKADU, UDUPI - 576 101 UDUPI DISTRICT …RESPONDENT (Respondent - Served) Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010435012025 NC: 2026:KHC:38414 WP No. 19220 of 2025 THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI, WRIT OR DIRECTION, BY QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ORDER OF ARREST DATED 26.06.2025 IN EXECUTION PETITION NO.31/2024 ON THE FILE OF THE UDUPI DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UDUPI VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND TO STAY ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT THERETO AND TO DECLARE THAT THE ORDER PASSED THEREON IS ERRONEOUS AND WELL AS ILLEGAL, ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 24.07.2026, which reads as under: "It is respectfully submits is as follows: On account of the Execution Case No.31/2024 on the file of the Udupi District Consumers Disputes Redressed Commission filed by the Petitioner itself came to be disposed which is challenged by the Petitioner before the Karnataka State Consumers Redressal Commission in Case No.AE28/2026 and as - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010435012025 NC: 2026:KHC:38414 WP No. 19220 of 2025 such the relief sought for by the petitioner in this Writ Petition does not survive for consideration. Hence, the Writ Petition may kindly be disposed accordingly". 2. Memo is placed on record. In view of the memo, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE DH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 44