114+115+122 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 114 CWP-21567-2026 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION:17.07.2026 NO. 1551505X, Ex-NK (TS) NAR SINGH (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LR. SMT. SHINDER KAUR ......PETITIONER Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS .........RESPONDENTS 115 CWP-21568-2026 (O&M) NO. 13738878A, Ex-L/NK RAM BHUSHAN ….PETITIONER vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS 122 CWP-21686-2026 (O&M) NO. 3987745A, Ex-SEP SURESH PAUL THAKUR ...PETITIONER VS. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL Present: Mr. Mehtab Singh Bhatti, Advocate, for the petitioners (in all petitions). Dr. Anju Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent-Union of India (in CWP-21568-2026) NITIN 2026.07.18 11:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Mr. S.K. Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent (in CWP-21567-2026). Mr. Ashish Chaudhary, Advocate, for the respondent-UOI (in CWP-21686-2026). ***** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J.(ORAL) 1. By way of present petitions, the petitioners seek appropriate directions to the Armed Forces Tribunal, Regional Bench, Chandigarh (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Tribunal), to decide the execution applications filed by the petitioners so as to execute the orders passed by the Tribunal extending certain benefits in favour of the petitioners. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the respondent authorities did not implement the impugned orders within the stipulated time period of three months, as had been directed by the Tribunal, therefore, the execution applications were filed by the petitioners, seeking a direction for expeditious disposal of the said execution applications. 3. Notice of motion. 4. On the asking of the Court, Mr. S.K. Sharma, Mr. Ashish Chaudhary and Dr. Anju Sharma-Union of India accepts notice on behalf of respondents. 5. Learned counsel for the respondents has not been able to dispute with regard to the aforesaid factual position in all the cases. 6. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the record with their able assistance. 7. Considering the nature of relief being sought in the writ petitions and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the cases, the NITIN 2026.07.18 11:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document writ petitions are disposed of with a direction to the Tribunal to take necessary steps to dispose of the execution applications filed by the petitioner(s) by passing a final order, in accordance with law, preferably within a period of four months from the date of receipt or production of certified copy of this order. 8. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. 9. A photocopy of this order be placed on the file of the other connected cases. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE JULY 17, 2026 (AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL) nitin JUDGE Whether Speaking Yes Whether Reportable No NITIN 2026.07.18 11:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document