Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20119 CRL.RP No. 589 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.589 OF 2026 BETWEEN:
1.
SMT.ANITHA B C D/O CHANDRAYAPA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/AT NO.436, 1ST FLOOR, 12TH CROSS, KUVEMPUNAGAR, HASSAN-573 201.
PH 9449941482.
2.
SMT. SUNITHA B.C.
D/O CHANDRAYAPA,, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/AT THIRUMALAPURA VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, HOLENARASIPURA TALUK, MOODALAHIPPE POST, NEAR GOVT. POLYTECHNIC, HOLENARASIPURA-572 211.
HASSAN DISTRICT.
PH - 8971424276. …PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. AKHIL BABU, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY HOLENARASIPURA RURAL POLICE STATION, HOLENARASIPURA - 573 211.
Digitally signed by MALATESH K C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20119 CRL.RP No. 589 of 2026
REPRESENTED BY - STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU - 560 001.
2.
SRI. SRINIVASA T.V.
S/O LATE VARADAIAH, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, R/AT THIRUMALAPURA VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, HOLENARASIPURA TALUK, MOODALAHIPPE POST, NEAR GOVT. POLYTECHNIC, HOLENARASIPURA 573 211.
HASSAN DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K.NAGESHWARAPPA, HCGP)
THIS CRL.RP FILED U/S.397 AND 401 (FILED U/S 438 R/W SEC.442 BNSS) CR.P.C., PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE
ORDER IMPOSING FINE OF RS.3000/- ON CW 2 DATED 27.03.2026 AND DIRECT REFUND OF FINE AMOUNT OF RS.3000/- PAID VIDE RECEIPT NO.0276591 DATED 27.03.2026 AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
ORAL ORDER
Heard Sri Akhil Babu, learned counsel for the petitioners in respect of maintainability of the revision petition.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20119 CRL.RP No. 589 of 2026
2. The order that is challenge in the present revision petition is issue of non-bailable warrant to the petitioners who are C.W.1 and C.W.2 in SC.No.193/2023 before the Prl. District and Sessions Judge, Hassan.
3. Admittedly, the said order is an interlocutory
order and therefore, the revision petition is not maintainable. Accordingly, criminal revision petition is dismissed.
Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE
PB List No.: 2 Sl No.: 23